I understand Jim. Tape is hard to argue with. Like the tape of JD’s first, and honest, assessment of Don (Americas Hitler?). And all the other assessments of Don from his own appointees, the people he assured us were “the best people” when he appointed them. Tell me, why DO all these people go on tape telling the truth, only to self-geld, again on tape, later?
I understand Jim. Tape is hard to argue with. Like the tape of JD’s first, and honest, assessment of Don (Americas Hitler?). And all the other assessments of Don from his own appointees, the people he assured us were “the best people” when he appointed them. Tell me, why DO all these people go on tape telling the truth, only to self-geld, again on tape, later?
I understand Jim. Tape is hard to argue with. Like the tape of JD’s first, and honest, assessment of Don (Americas Hitler?). And all the other assessments of Don from his own appointees, the people he assured us were “the best people” when he appointed them. Tell me, why DO all these people go on tape telling the truth, only to self-geld, again on tape, later?